The concern could be that at a certain point, there's isn't any way that a member is reading the messages before giving the bravos. There's also a daily limit to the amount of bravos that a member can give.
Well you may not have found who created those controversial accounts that bravoed @Anonymous but I think we have proved beyond a reasonable doubt today....that it wasn't @Anonymous !😃
Youre not the only one I have to explain this to....someone created 9 accounts and bravoed S--S like 900 times. It was noticed by an Oracle and reported and then posted about in the lounge and then everyone had a hate on for S--S despite claiming her innocence. Pm investigated but didn't announce anything except to tell S--S they don't believe it was her.....presumably by the IP address and the obvious way of creating the accounts and the bravos that were either just under 100 in an hour or over 100 in about 70 minutes. Since S--S showed today that they were completely unaware of the bravo flood warning the created accounts are extremely unlikely to be created by S--S.
Lol....by not knowing the answer to @barrascuk's post you just proved you couldn't have created those accounts!😄😅😆🤣🤣🤣!!!
@darlicious How so ? I'm still trying to figure out how the response showed anything one way or the other when there was no question. 🤔🤔
edited to ad : I can understand the warning ...how do you read twenty posts a minute and still understand what is being written to know if it warrants a bravo ?
Well you may not have found who created those controversial accounts that bravoed @Anonymous but I think we have proved beyond a reasonable doubt today....that it wasn't @Anonymous !😃
That message has been around for quite sometime as has the 100 bravos per hour message first reported during my time here by @JenL . Just community reward safety protocols to prevent excessive bravoing.....i think this also proves @Anonymous innocence......
you need to refreshing your network and the system, so what is your issue if you can do that do you will losing anything No, just try to do it and you will see the difference....
@barrascuk : lol. No to everything. If you're blasting through a thread with a lot of posts in it like the Top Contributors then just slow down. Do you have the default page length of posts or did you extend that? It takes the few moments to go to the next page.
