09-11-2023 07:52 AM
Well, this is disappointing… Two days ago, I wrote the following post (which I have modified here in the hopes of avoiding deletion). After receiving several bravos and positive responses, it was flagged as S.P.A.M.! No reason given. I messaged the Moderator, but did not receive a response. I also wrote another post referring to this… This morning, both were deleted! Of course, so were the helpful responses, and my Bravos.
As I put a lot of thought and time into this post in an effort to help my fellow PM’ers, I will attempt to offer it again, this time rewording a bit, and removing some parts which may have annoyed the sp’m bots.
OK, so here is a workaround to enable you to download, and properly order, up to 90 days of Usage History, while waiting for PM to resolve the issue of downloads containing only a small amount of history, regardless of the time-span selected.
First, a clarification: Some people say it only downloads 6 days at a time, some 3, etc... In fact, after some experimentation, I have found that downloads always contain exactly 60 records (i.e. 'activities', such as calls, texts, data) at a time, no more, no less. So, if you have lots of 'activities' in your days, you will have less days per download.
It seemed, at first, that the days downloaded were random, but after I discovered the ‘60 activities’ aspect, I also realised that every download would start at the most recent (To) date requested, and go back sixty activities. The technique, therefore, is to download 60 activities, note the earliest date downloaded, and repeat the process from there, using that date as the “To” date (your last download will probably have less than 60). Note: a download may stop anywhere within a day, which is why you need to include that day in the next download; duplicates will be removed later.
The following workaround will produce a series of Excel (.xls) spreadsheets, which can later be combined, the duplicates removed, then sorted and used properly. (PM: it would be better if they were csv, as they would be more compatible with other apps, and manipulatable as text. If it were csv/text, I could simply concantenate all of the files with one command, instead of the tedious process in Step 14.)
Note, it is not possible to go back more than 90 days in history. More than that will require a ticket with PM.
Steps to download Public Mobile Usage Data
One last little problem to address: The “Date/Time” column will be textual, e.g. “Sep 08, 2023 09:17”, so sorting on this line will do so alphabetically, i.e. APR, AUG, JAN, etc., regardless of day, year, or time.
If you edit (F2) each one, then just press Enter, it should convert to a date, but that’s a pain with hundreds or thousands, of entries, so instead I added a column to the right (column F, in the current download format) with the following formula:
=DATEVALUE(LEFT(A2,12))+TIME(MID(A2,14,2),RIGHT(A2,2),0)
This assumes, of course, that you are on the first record, whose date is in cell A2. Copy this formula down, also adding it to subsequent downloads.
Now, you can sort on this column, and everything should sort properly, chronologically.
One annoying issue PM did resolve near the end of May, I think, (thank you, PM!) was that in earlier downloads, it just repeated the date twice, instead of giving the time (I know how this can happen, programmatically, but won’t go into that here). Now, they do show the time.
That’s it… If you’ve read this far, Bravo to you! 🙂 If this was helpful to you, a Bravo from you would be appreciated!
10-16-2023 10:51 AM
Thanks for the feedback, @hTideGnow, it's appreciated!
Yes, the Excel formula could have looked strange to the machine. How ironic.
Yeah, I stuck with PM to get this [re-re-]published, because a) I hoped it could help, and I'd put a lot of time into it, and b) as a matter of principle... I can be pretty stubborn that way 😉
10-16-2023 10:28 AM
oh yeah, the date was from Sept. I was wondering why no one comment too
I think the Excel formula fooled the system. But usually once it is here for 5 or 10 mins, it won't be a spam anymore
thanks for the sharing, you put in extra effort to have this shared
10-16-2023 10:24 AM
Side-note: This post, too, was flagged as spam; no reason given. Again, I wrote to the moderator(s), and again, no reply. Again, I opened a ticket with PM which was at first greeted with the formulaic "we're so sorry, we're happy to help, we'll get this fixed soon", then relative silence. I followed up regularly, and occasionally received another formulaic answer like the one above, but nothing more.
FINALLY, 35 days later, "Andu" (Thank you, Andu!) replied, first saying sorry it had been deleted, and then an hour later saying they'd found it and it has been marked as not spam. Phew; let's hope that this time it holds!
10-16-2023 09:36 AM - edited 10-16-2023 09:41 AM
it's helpful and worth a bravo. Great work, Great Tips 🙂