verification sms back to 227898

[darlicious]

@computergeek541 

Editing? Geez how does big_rick get banned within 12 hours but this username is acceptable?

[dabr]

---

@esjliv wrote:

Coming into this one late. Mmm, my mind is going into curious places?

😂

---

@esjliv   Haha....well if you're really curious RosieR did tag the "username" mentioned in the original thread with the same heading (from where this thread was cut) and it's still there... 😁

[esjliv]

Coming into this one late. Mmm, my mind is going into curious places?

😂

[darlicious]

@Anonymous 

Oh there's lots of them out there.... @tigerwang1 comes to mind.

[Anonymous]

Well I don't see the problem other than TMI identity theft. There's a Dickey Betts. There are lots of Richard Balls in search engines. The original big_rick is an obvious provocation though.

[darlicious]

@computergeek541 

Well I didn't expect that it was more of a comment to draw attention to what needed to be edited or moved or archived or reported as it was....but thanks for doing what you do.

[computergeek541]

@darlicious 

Please note that bans are not something that I can decide upon or issue.  This type of username issue would need to be discussed with a moderator.

[darlicious]

@LurganIeUk 

The weird thing is big_rick never posted publicly so it was somehow flagged by the system. Hopefully the OP doesn't get a permanent email ban for his "humourous" choice in username. I think that should be communicated to the moderator.....the six month IP address was bad enough.

[LurganIeUk]

---

@darlicious wrote:

@computergeek541 

Editing? Geez how does big_rick get banned within 12 hours but this username is acceptable?

---

I just reported.  

[dabr]

---

@darlicious wrote:

@computergeek541 

Editing? Geez how does big_rick get banned within 12 hours but this username is acceptable?

---

@darlicious   Lol....I didn't even pay attention to the "username" until you mentioned it!