Here's my take, IF PM were to scrape 3G and Create a 4G-Specific W/O LTE

[makkahn28]

Here's my take on how I see things: I think the 3G Plans are way too Vain, and perhaps out of sync with the realities we face.

Here's what I would have done differently:

IF 4G speeds were let's say, 51MB, I would cap at let's say 31MB, a Middle of the ground approach

Let's say, Prov-Wide+Global Txt+4GB under 3G was $57for 30 Days, and the LTE $80,

What IF Take that same plan, BUT under 4G, BUT no LTE, and 31 instead of 51MB, $55, LTE Version $75, would that be fair?

90 Days:

Let's say, Prov-Wide+Global Txt+6GB under 3G was $141

Take same version, just LTE, $180

Prov-Wide+Global Txt+6GB under 4G $140

Same version BUT LTE, $152

Can-Wide+Global Txt+6GB under 3G was $156

LTE Version $195

Can-Wide US+Global Txt+6GB under 3G was $171

LTE Version  $210

Can-Wide US+Global Txt+6GB under 4G $170

LTE Version $185

4G version:  $155

LTE Version  $172

[makkahn28]

Take what I suggested, and see IF anyone feels it's fair, or If they can make better

[will13am]

I think the old pricing scheme was fair, $40 for 2 gigs of data and province wide talk, text.  I don't know that speed matters too much when consuming all of a few gigs a month as long as it is not crippled.  Considering that Public Mobile has no stores or call centre access, the savings must be shared with the customer.  To me I am fine not having these expensive luxuries, but many customers want it and will stick with brands that have it.  We get what we pay for.  BTW, I was at the mall after work today to buy something.  The number of cellular stores was staggering.  Typically the 2-3 employees were bored out of their skulls. 

[makkahn28]

Yeah, BUT IF PM were t have done things differently, the 3G Idea was horrible, and a complete waste of potential

IF PM were to have made the 4G Stuff work, W/O the LTE additional, sometimes a compromise, BUT NOT as extreme as what the 3G stuff did