02-08-2017 10:27 PM - edited 01-05-2022 01:43 AM
Mobile syrup posted an article on the CRTC's review of wireless code proceedings concerning unlocking fees. This agenda is obviously self serving to Freedom Mobile given that they don't have access to selling iPhones. This should also be of interest to Public Mobile and its customer given that there are no phones for sale here. As a customer who totally endorses the business model of separating hardware from services, I am really happy to see this being brought up. Hopefully, the CRTC will do something about this and help open up the cell phone market.
Let's engage in a lively dicussion on this topic. Anyone here against banning factory locked cell phone?
http://mobilesyrup.com/2017/02/08/freedom-mobile-crtc-do-away-with-unlocking-fees/
02-09-2017 08:04 PM
In all honesty, right now the best deals on phones seem to be from Koodo. Their actiation credit on signup doesn't get clawed back if you cancel, so you can buy a phone on a plan, port your number out as soon as your phone arrives, and have an instant discount.
02-09-2017 07:30 PM
02-09-2017 01:05 PM
I've learned over the years that the CRTC rulings are a two edged sword. The intentions are good for Canadians in general, but what results is carrier backlash in the form of price increases.
The carriers will not accept any change to their bottom line. If they are forced, they will make up the difference in other ways and come up with the most ridiculous excuses for them.
02-09-2017 11:13 AM
Well, you know what'll happen if there are no more locked phones/unlocking fees: discounted devices will start disappearing. Carriers will have zero incentive to offer subsidized devices if they can't lock you in for at least 3 months and disincentivize leaving with unlocking fees. I'd love to see it, but the carriers are almost guaranteed to find a way to screw over the customers in the process (see also: contracts being limited to 2 years)
02-09-2017 09:05 AM
02-09-2017 08:25 AM
Even the bloatware crap that Samsung has been producing, I think it's call SenseUI ??, is awful on the older devices.
I wish the Nexus devices would contine, but the inflatted prices over the years has made them unaffordable, and the Pixel branding on the new "stock android" is again just a money grab.
I agree that a direct purchased phone from anyone, carrier, department store, or manufacturer should be immediately available unlocked, and there should be no cost for doing so as the device should be separate from the service.
02-09-2017 12:08 AM
@Shutdown wrote:It's a start, but the least they can do is allow you to uninstall the carrier bloatware and crap that screw up the phone. They should also not delay an android update once it's ready. Also even if they do this they will just increase the base price or something of the phone so it will end up actually not making a difference. It's best to just buy it directly from some OEM that sells directly in canada like samsung/apple/nexus/one plus.
I agree, the carriers can try to make back the money in a different way. The stupid bloatware carriers add gets in the way of much needed software upgrades. This tiny step is the thin edge of the wedge that will help to separate hardware sales from the service plans.
Personally, I avoid carrier phones for the noted issues. I want to install security updates at my leisure and not when the carrier is good and ready to deliver them to me. Tops on the list of phone features for me are unlockable bootloader and xda support.
02-08-2017 11:07 PM - edited 02-08-2017 11:09 PM
It's a start, but the least they can do is allow you to uninstall the carrier bloatware and crap that screw up the phone. They should also not delay an android update once it's ready. Also even if they do this they will just increase the base price or something of the phone so it will end up actually not making a difference. It's best to just buy it directly from some OEM that sells directly in canada like samsung/apple/nexus/one plus.